Review

multi-peak gaussian fitting software (OriginLab corp)

OriginLab corp manufactures this product

About

News

Press Release

Team

Advisors

Partners

Contact

Bioz Stars

Bioz vStars

Buy from Supplier

Structured Review

OriginLab corp multi-peak gaussian fitting software
$NTA, TRPS, CLS, nFCM and AF4‐MALS measurements of trimodal sample J (CPN60/CPN100/CPN150 at 1/1/1). NTA, TRPS and nFCM measurements were averaged over 3 runs, and CLS over two runs. AF4‐MALS was only performed once. The NTA inset shows the <t>multi‐Gaussian</t> fit of its PSD. The CLS inset shows the baseline‐correction of the mass‐weighted PSD, whilst the AF4‐MALS inset shows the respective number density‐based fractogram and sample specific particle peak positions$
Multi Peak Gaussian Fitting Software, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/multi-peak gaussian fitting software/product/OriginLab corp
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews

multi-peak gaussian fitting software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05

90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Measuring particle concentration of multimodal synthetic reference materials and extracellular vesicles with orthogonal techniques: Who is up to the challenge?"

Article Title: Measuring particle concentration of multimodal synthetic reference materials and extracellular vesicles with orthogonal techniques: Who is up to the challenge?

Journal: Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

doi: 10.1002/jev2.12052

$NTA, TRPS, CLS, nFCM and AF4‐MALS measurements of trimodal sample J (CPN60/CPN100/CPN150 at 1/1/1). NTA, TRPS and nFCM measurements were averaged over 3 runs, and CLS over two runs. AF4‐MALS was only performed once. The NTA inset shows the multi‐Gaussian fit of its PSD. The CLS inset shows the baseline‐correction of the mass‐weighted PSD, whilst the AF4‐MALS inset shows the respective number density‐based fractogram and sample specific particle peak positions$
Figure Legend Snippet: NTA, TRPS, CLS, nFCM and AF4‐MALS measurements of trimodal sample J (CPN60/CPN100/CPN150 at 1/1/1). NTA, TRPS and nFCM measurements were averaged over 3 runs, and CLS over two runs. AF4‐MALS was only performed once. The NTA inset shows the multi‐Gaussian fit of its PSD. The CLS inset shows the baseline‐correction of the mass‐weighted PSD, whilst the AF4‐MALS inset shows the respective number density‐based fractogram and sample specific particle peak positions

Techniques Used:

$NTA, TRPS, CLS, nFCM, AF4‐MALS and MADLS measurements of quadrimodal sample C (CPN100/CPN150/CPN200/CPN240 at 25/25/25/25). NTA, TRPS, nFCM and MADLS measurements were averaged over 3 runs and CLS over 2. AF4‐MALS was only performed once. The NTA inset shows the multi‐Gaussian fit of its PSD. The CLS inset shows the base‐line correction of the respective mass‐weighted PSD, whilst the AF4‐MALS inset shows the number density‐based fractogram and sample specific particle peak positions. The MADLS inset shows the intensity‐weighted PSD$
Figure Legend Snippet: NTA, TRPS, CLS, nFCM, AF4‐MALS and MADLS measurements of quadrimodal sample C (CPN100/CPN150/CPN200/CPN240 at 25/25/25/25). NTA, TRPS, nFCM and MADLS measurements were averaged over 3 runs and CLS over 2. AF4‐MALS was only performed once. The NTA inset shows the multi‐Gaussian fit of its PSD. The CLS inset shows the base‐line correction of the respective mass‐weighted PSD, whilst the AF4‐MALS inset shows the number density‐based fractogram and sample specific particle peak positions. The MADLS inset shows the intensity‐weighted PSD

Techniques Used:

$NTA, TRPS, nFCM, CLS, AF4‐MALS and MADLS measurements of quadrimodal sample I (CPN100/CPN150/CPN200/CPN240 at 10/50/30/10). NTA, TRPS, nFCM and MALDS measurements were averaged over 3 runs and CLS over 2. AF4‐MALS was only performed once. The NTA inset shows the multi‐Gaussian fit of its PSD. The CLS inset shows the base‐line correction of the respective mass‐weighted PSD, whilst the AF4‐MALS inset shows the number density‐based fractogram and sample specific particle peak positions. The MADLS inset shows the intensity‐weighted PSD$
Figure Legend Snippet: NTA, TRPS, nFCM, CLS, AF4‐MALS and MADLS measurements of quadrimodal sample I (CPN100/CPN150/CPN200/CPN240 at 10/50/30/10). NTA, TRPS, nFCM and MALDS measurements were averaged over 3 runs and CLS over 2. AF4‐MALS was only performed once. The NTA inset shows the multi‐Gaussian fit of its PSD. The CLS inset shows the base‐line correction of the respective mass‐weighted PSD, whilst the AF4‐MALS inset shows the number density‐based fractogram and sample specific particle peak positions. The MADLS inset shows the intensity‐weighted PSD

Techniques Used:

Image Search Results

Journal: Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

Article Title: Measuring particle concentration of multimodal synthetic reference materials and extracellular vesicles with orthogonal techniques: Who is up to the challenge?

doi: 10.1002/jev2.12052

Figure Lengend Snippet: NTA, TRPS, CLS, nFCM and AF4‐MALS measurements of trimodal sample J (CPN60/CPN100/CPN150 at 1/1/1). NTA, TRPS and nFCM measurements were averaged over 3 runs, and CLS over two runs. AF4‐MALS was only performed once. The NTA inset shows the multi‐Gaussian fit of its PSD. The CLS inset shows the baseline‐correction of the mass‐weighted PSD, whilst the AF4‐MALS inset shows the respective number density‐based fractogram and sample specific particle peak positions

Article Snippet: For this purpose, multi‐peak Gaussian fitting was applied, using Origin lab 9 software.

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

Article Title: Measuring particle concentration of multimodal synthetic reference materials and extracellular vesicles with orthogonal techniques: Who is up to the challenge?

doi: 10.1002/jev2.12052

Figure Lengend Snippet: NTA, TRPS, CLS, nFCM, AF4‐MALS and MADLS measurements of quadrimodal sample C (CPN100/CPN150/CPN200/CPN240 at 25/25/25/25). NTA, TRPS, nFCM and MADLS measurements were averaged over 3 runs and CLS over 2. AF4‐MALS was only performed once. The NTA inset shows the multi‐Gaussian fit of its PSD. The CLS inset shows the base‐line correction of the respective mass‐weighted PSD, whilst the AF4‐MALS inset shows the number density‐based fractogram and sample specific particle peak positions. The MADLS inset shows the intensity‐weighted PSD

Article Snippet: For this purpose, multi‐peak Gaussian fitting was applied, using Origin lab 9 software.

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

Article Title: Measuring particle concentration of multimodal synthetic reference materials and extracellular vesicles with orthogonal techniques: Who is up to the challenge?

doi: 10.1002/jev2.12052

Figure Lengend Snippet: NTA, TRPS, nFCM, CLS, AF4‐MALS and MADLS measurements of quadrimodal sample I (CPN100/CPN150/CPN200/CPN240 at 10/50/30/10). NTA, TRPS, nFCM and MALDS measurements were averaged over 3 runs and CLS over 2. AF4‐MALS was only performed once. The NTA inset shows the multi‐Gaussian fit of its PSD. The CLS inset shows the base‐line correction of the respective mass‐weighted PSD, whilst the AF4‐MALS inset shows the number density‐based fractogram and sample specific particle peak positions. The MADLS inset shows the intensity‐weighted PSD

Article Snippet: For this purpose, multi‐peak Gaussian fitting was applied, using Origin lab 9 software.

Techniques:

Review

Structured Review

Images

1) Product Images from "Measuring particle concentration of multimodal synthetic reference materials and extracellular vesicles with orthogonal techniques: Who is up to the challenge?"

Similar Products

Image Search Results